Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?
From: mike (mike_at_mikenjane.net)
Date: 06/14/05
- Previous message: Carlos E. R.: "RE: [SLE] Changing runlevel priorities"
- In reply to: D'Arcy MacIsaac: "Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?"
- Next in thread: M. Todd Smith: "Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?"
- Reply: M. Todd Smith: "Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:16:34 +0200
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 06:44, D'Arcy MacIsaac wrote:
> >or an ATi based card. Any comments or insights would
> >be greatly appreciated!
> >Thanx...
> >-Ubence
>
> Go with the Nvidia, unless you're really into pain and massive
> annoyance. I imagine both have great lines of cards, but in terms of
> linux (and bsd) friendliness, nvidia's the only serious game in town
> (stupid easy SINGLE driver install for most of their models (by
> single I'm comparing it to that monstrosity of a web site that ATI
> has you hunt around to find just the right driver for your particular
> card), and great performance).
Gosh, that's strange. The ATI drivers were included with the distro.
Didn't have to download them. And they installed without any problems.
> ATIs on the other hand are an abhorrence in Linux. I should know, my
> Linux desktop at work (a Dell optiplex 280) has an ATI X300 on it. I
> did try their most recent driver (with the gui installer and all),
> and the best I've gotten with it now is 2D, 3D doesn't work. I did
> have 3D working at one point with the card, on SUSE I believe using
> the older fglrx drivers that were on the 9.3 dvd, but not now. Even
> when I've seen 3D working on it though (under linux), performance has
> been subpar. My old GeForce2 would've given better results I think.
I picked up the latest from SUSE. Same as the ATI site, installed and
work flawlessly. BTW the card is a 9800pro on a dual AMD platform. AS
for yours, I wouldn't even purchase a dell. Most that I've seen, and we
have about 125 of them at work, are the worst excuse for a computer
I've seen. Shoddy workmanship and cheap parts.
If you can't get it to work, that's fine. But your general statement is
just plain wrong.
Mike
-- Powered by SuSE 9.3 Kernel 2.6.11 KDE 3.4.0 Kmail 1.8 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 4:12pm up 3 days 1:52, 4 users, load average: 2.22, 2.19, 2.17 -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Carlos E. R.: "RE: [SLE] Changing runlevel priorities"
- In reply to: D'Arcy MacIsaac: "Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?"
- Next in thread: M. Todd Smith: "Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?"
- Reply: M. Todd Smith: "Re: [SLE] Has anyone tried the new ATi Linux driver, version 8.14.13?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|