Re: [SLE] Hitting reply-all to the list
From: Shriramana Sharma (samjnaa_at_gmail.com)
Date: 08/22/05
- Previous message: Greg Wallace: "RE: [SLE] Novell Linux to be in Indiana Schools!!"
- In reply to: Peter Nikolic: "Re: [SLE] Hitting reply-all to the list"
- Next in thread: Mikus Grinbergs: "Re: [SLE] Hitting reply-all to the list"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:57:32 +0530 To: SuSE Linux List <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
On Monday 22 August 2005 02:48, chris wrote:
>> We would all have a better quality list if people would stop arguing
>> about nothing. It is my suspicion that those who start this topic up and
>> keep it going are in fact windows moles dedicated to disrupting the
>> list. Could you shut up please?
My friend, I who started this list have shut up quite some time ago. If
you will read my original post, you will see that I asked two very
pointed questions:
%------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Should I file an enhancement bug with Mozilla?
2. if I hit reply-to-all, the message gets addressed to the original
sender, but it cc-s to the list. Does this cause the original sender to
get two copies of my reply?
%------------------------------------------------------------------------
I found out the answer to question 1 myself, later. It was reported back
on 2000-07-17 as bug #45715. I've got answers to question 2 long ago
back on this thread. The other mails were not requested by me from the
other users, but sent of their own free will. Please do not blame me if
a thread escalates into proportions I certainly did not intend it to. I
am not responsible for other people voicing their opinions on some topic
related to my thread.
I'm sorry if I started a sensitive issue (I didn't realize it was), but
I certainly did nothing to inflame it, as your mail history will show,
so please do not reprimand me for being a "Windows mole" or tell me to
"shut up". Calling a person who wants to learn to operate Linux and is
understandably (at least to some people) finding some difficulties with
it a "Windows mole" is not helping me transiting to Linux. AFAIR nobody
on any other forum insulted me for my disabilities, and I *accept* that
being stuck with Windows for some thing is a disability.
Can you fix my modem problem? I reported it back on this very same list
at 2005-08-10 20:58:18 CEST. If you can do that, that will help me shift
to Linux for 75% of my needs. Right now I've set GRUB to default-boot to
Windows simply because I can't access the net and my mail from Linux. If
you can help me solve that problem then you are helping me with Linux.
Calling me a Windows mole will not help me with Linux.
Peter Nikolic wrote:
> At last someone with sense there is nothing wrong with this list
> like i said well said chris ..
Here Peter is labouring under the assumption that I have ever suggested
that anything is wrong with this list. If Peter will re-read the two
pointed questions I made (quoted above) then Peter will realize that I
have not complained about this list in any way.
Thank you all, for your cooperation.
-- Shriramana Sharma http://samvit.org (o- Penguin #395953 //\ running on ancient Indian wisdom V_/_ and modern computing efficiency -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Greg Wallace: "RE: [SLE] Novell Linux to be in Indiana Schools!!"
- In reply to: Peter Nikolic: "Re: [SLE] Hitting reply-all to the list"
- Next in thread: Mikus Grinbergs: "Re: [SLE] Hitting reply-all to the list"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
