Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?
From: Allen (gorebofh_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/04/05
- Previous message: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- In reply to: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Next in thread: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Reply: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Reply: Hans Witvliet: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 13:54:22 -0400 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 06:37:58PM +0100, Dylan wrote:
> On Sunday 04 Sep 2005 18:11, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > Mike,
> >
> > On Sunday 04 September 2005 09:56, Mike wrote:
> <SNIP>
> > > Data recovery experts are able to undo several writes to a disk,
> > > which is why wipe disk programs do several passes, and agencies
> > > that are concerned about loss of data grind up the disk afterwards
> > > rather than take the chance that someone may have improved the
> > > technique to read wiped data.
Ummm, yea, and the good people over at... Can't say, but they can read off
a HD that has been on fire, and even after 49 overwrites.
> > Even assuming this claim is valid, why on earth would anybody go to
> > these lengths?
Lol, you've never seen people in high tech espionage?
> OK, one of my close friends is head of IT auditing for a major City law
> firm. Recently, a dispute arose between two of their clients over a
> clause in a contract. Basically, one party claimed a rewording had not
> been authorised. Several hard drives and backup sets were analysed by a
> third party data recovery outfit who recovered a complete edit trail of
> the relevant documents. Some parts had to be extracted from
> over-written temporaray files because intermediate copies of the
> documents had been deleted and didn't occur in the nightly backups.
> This being a law firm dealing in contracts amounting to many millions
> of pounds each, they keep copious backups. The fact the intermediate
> documents were deleted may or may not be a matter of criminal
> investigation. The edit trail of the documents in this case are
> currently being considered by other lawyers to assess whether they can
> be upheld in court. So, to answer your question - the claim IS valid,
> and when millions of pounds or criminal action can rest on the validity
> of a document it becomes worth going to those lengths.
Why not just take all that and say instead:
Deleted isn't.
> > And does anyone ever stop to apply logic to this claim? Do you think
> > this retained data is neatly layered so you can distinguish the
> > remnants from each of those previous write cycles?
> Manifestly, it is possible. The same heuristics which are applied in the
> analysis of document authenticity for historical attribution and
> plagiarism resolution can be applied to overlapping data sets in order
> to separate them diachronically.
>
> > > There have also been rumors that they can read data from old ram,
>
> I'd be very sceptical about that.
I wouldn't, seen inside the FBI ;)
> > > and the EM leaking from your screen can be read from across the
> > > street.
Lol when I was young I used to use a TV on a certain channel and cordless
phone to tap into calls. This isnothing new.
> But this is true, I've seen it done first hand - how do you think TV
> detector vans work to find licence avoiders (in the UK.)
>
> Dylan
>
> --
> "The man who strikes first admits that his ideas have given out."
> (Chinese Proverb)
^
That is awesome!
-Gore / Allen
> --
> Check the headers for your unsubscription address
> For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
> Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
> Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
>
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- In reply to: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Next in thread: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Reply: Dylan: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Reply: Hans Witvliet: "Re: [SLE] Root password - is it THAT simple to alter it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|