Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3
From: Anders Johansson (andjoh_at_rydsbo.net)
Date: 09/05/05
- Previous message: Mike Dewhirst: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- In reply to: Mike Dewhirst: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Next in thread: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Reply: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Reply: Mike Dewhirst: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 03:35:30 +0200
On Monday 05 September 2005 03:30, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> Why would SLES be better than 9.3 for Oracle? For Firebird too?
>
> Stability maybe? I've heard that SuSE Pro is a bit leading edge.
Partly about stability and longevity (SLES is maintained for seven years, 9.3
only for two), and partly about certifications. Oracle support won't touch
you unless you're running on a platform they've certified. I have no idea how
the firebird people treat that
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Mike Dewhirst: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- In reply to: Mike Dewhirst: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Next in thread: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Reply: Anders Johansson: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Reply: Mike Dewhirst: "Re: [SLE] 64-bit Suse 9.3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|