Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards
From: Sandy Drobic (suse-linux-e_at_japantest.homelinux.com)
Date: 09/08/05
- Previous message: Phil Burness: "[SLE] K3b"
- In reply to: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards"
- Next in thread: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards"
- Reply: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:24:09 +0200 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Sandy Drobic wrote:
>
>> Found it: it was an Areca 1120 (PCI-X) or Areca 1220 (PCI-E), though I
>> don't know if they used the battery option or not.
>
>
> Thanks! Do you have a link for that? If not, was it done in Linux?
Unfortunately not, the tests were performed with Windows. The cards are
supposed to work with Suse Linux and Redhat Linux. The only link I have is
a German one: www.stargate.de
Sandy
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Phil Burness: "[SLE] K3b"
- In reply to: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards"
- Next in thread: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards"
- Reply: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] 3ware vs Areca SATA cards"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|