Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0
From: James Knott (james.knott_at_rogers.com)
Date: 09/30/05
- Previous message: Maccy: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- In reply to: Tony Alfrey: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- Next in thread: Tony Alfrey: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- Reply: Tony Alfrey: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:22:47 -0400 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Tony Alfrey wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>> Don wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ya know, this just drives home the fact of how each and every distro of
>>> linux is it's own PROPRIETARY environment...
>>
>>
>> While SuSe has a modified version of OO, there's no technical reason
>> that the version from OpenOffice.org won't run. Also, most Linux
>> distros are moving to LSB, so that all the relevant files etc., will be
>> in the same place.
>>
>
> Sorry, what is "LSB" please??
>
http://www.linuxbase.org/modules.php?name=FAQ
It's a standard method for building Linux systems, so that apps etc.,
don't need to be written in different verions, for different distros.
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Maccy: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- In reply to: Tony Alfrey: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- Next in thread: Tony Alfrey: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- Reply: Tony Alfrey: "Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
