Re: [SLE] ntp failure
From: Carlos E. R. (robin1.listas_at_tiscali.es)
Date: 11/07/05
- Previous message: Matt Stamm: "[SLE] Need help with new TAR behavior"
- In reply to: Per Jessen: "Re: [SLE] ntp failure"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] ntp failure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:31:05 +0100 (CET) To: SLE <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2005-11-07 at 16:10 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> I would say it's a little unusual that you have to explicitly allow for
> outbound NAT'ing of certain ports and traffic. Inbound (DNAT'ing) I
> can understand, but outbound is a little strange to me. My Zyxel
> router used to do NAT'ing for me, and only on inbound did I need to set
> up ports and such.
No, ntp is diferent, it needs both directions, even if you only have a
client. That's the reason it has to be open in the firewall as well: there
is no need to open anything there for outgoing use.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFDb6t7tTMYHG2NR9URAufQAJ9JZnz97bY3W0Obm3atiqwkvz6v7gCfRGwy
dhXhZRFldIFsJ5sjx1M9dNI=
=e7v/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Matt Stamm: "[SLE] Need help with new TAR behavior"
- In reply to: Per Jessen: "Re: [SLE] ntp failure"
- Next in thread: Carlos E. R.: "Re: [SLE] ntp failure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
