Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade
From: Adagilson Batista Bispo da Silva (adagilson_at_cpqam.fiocruz.br)
Date: 11/11/05
- Previous message: Catimimi: "Re: [SLE] nvidia TV-out (2) : black and white output"
- In reply to: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade"
- Next in thread: Adagilson Batista Bispo da Silva: "Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade (SOLVED)"
- Reply: Adagilson Batista Bispo da Silva: "Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade (SOLVED)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:48:25 -0200 To: SLE <suse-linux-e@suse.com>
I edited /etc/sysconfig/kernel and added:
INITRD_MODULES="via89cxxx"
After running again
$mkdir /mnt/gonow
$mount /dev/hda6 /mnt/gonow
$chroot /mnt/gonow
$mkinitrd -R -u
...the system told me:
Root device: /dev/root (mounted on / ext2)
Module list: via82cxxx
You may now have to update your boot loader configuration
Then, I rebooted my box.
...and a new sequence of error messages continues:
[...]
Loading kernel/fs/jbd/jbd.ko
Loading kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.ko
/linuxrc: 264: syntax error: Bad substitution
VFS: Cannot open root device "hda6" or unknown-block(0,0)
Please apend a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
Could you help me again? I just don't know what is missing. I
thought just making it a new initrd with a redefined root, it would work.
adagilson
PS--my current boot loader, Grub, has this line to label SuSE 9.3:
kernel (hd0,5) /boot/vmlinuz too=/dev/hda6 vga=0x31a selinux=0
splash=silent resume=/dev/hda7 showapts
initrd (hd0,5) /boot/initrd
Hans du Plooy escreveu:
>On Thursday 10 November 2005 13:42, Adagilson Batista Bispo da Silva wrote:
>
>
>>I follow your tips, typing 3 to the boot options, but an error occurred:
>>"Waiting for device /dev/hda6 to appear .....not found -- exiting to
>>/bin/sh sh: can't access tty; job control turned off"
>>
>>
>The difference is that Slackware probably builds all their IDE drivers into
>the kernel, or include all of them in the initrd (dunno which, I haven't
>worked with Slack in ages), while SUSE only puts what's needed in there.
>
>So you previous board probably had a ALi chipset (popular on boards K6 boards
>of that era), while the new one is a VIA. when you boot of the rescue CD, d
>an lsmod and make note of which VIA module is loaded.
>
>
>
>>Ps--I tried Rescue mode:
>>$mkdir /mnt/gonow
>>$mount /dev/hda6 /mnt/gonow
>>$mkinitrd -R -u
>>--reboot--
>>
>>
>
>You're leaving out a crucial step. Edit /etc/sysconfig/kernel, and add the
>required module to the list. Then make the new initrd.
>
>Hans
>
>
>
- Previous message: Catimimi: "Re: [SLE] nvidia TV-out (2) : black and white output"
- In reply to: Hans du Plooy: "Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade"
- Next in thread: Adagilson Batista Bispo da Silva: "Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade (SOLVED)"
- Reply: Adagilson Batista Bispo da Silva: "Re: [SLE] slackware is better than SuSE --> to deal with upgrade (SOLVED)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|