Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin
From: James Knott (james.knott_at_rogers.com)
Date: 11/11/05
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: [SLE] Gnome disappointment"
- In reply to: Allen: "Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin"
- Next in thread: Jerry Feldman: "Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin"
- Reply: Jerry Feldman: "Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:04:51 -0500 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Allen wrote:
>> The line editor (Ed?) included with Pr1me computers was worse than
>> Edlin. I have never seen an editor as bad as that one.
>
> You've never used WordPad or Word have you?
Yes, I've used both and they're fantastic, compared with that Pr1me
editor. It was a line editor and IIRC, you could only use relative line
number, not aboslute, other that the 1st and last lines. So, if you
were working on line 29 and you wanted to work on line 12, you'd have to
jump -17 lines. You couldn't just jump to line 12. There were many
other oddities, which I have (thankfully) long since forgotten.
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: James Knott: "Re: [SLE] Gnome disappointment"
- In reply to: Allen: "Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin"
- Next in thread: Jerry Feldman: "Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin"
- Reply: Jerry Feldman: "Re: [SLE] early vi -- ed -- edlin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|