Re: [SLE] ...and speaking of SuSE / Novell...

From: Steven T. Hatton (hattons_at_globalsymmetry.com)
Date: 11/17/05

  • Next message: Steve Graegert: "Re: [SLE] Unable to mount DVDs"
    To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
    Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:10:59 -0500
    
    

    On Thursday 17 November 2005 12:46 pm, Andre Truter wrote:
    > On 11/17/05, Peter Van Lone <petervl@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > right .. it's called experience. 600 hours is only 15 weeks of
    > > experience. I don't have a problem with it, and did not complain. What
    > > I orginally said was "stop calling names of linux newbies that
    > > rely/use the GUI on a server to get work done"
    >
    > Yes, I agree that calling newbies names for using a GUI is wrong.
    > I have seen a number of newbies that start out with installing a GUI
    > on a server, until I show them that it is not really needed.
    > Now they run GUI stuff they need over ssh to thier workstations. :-)

    You /can/ run the entire DM over SSH. Sometimes it's convenient. For
    example, you may be confined to Windows and want a KDM. You can use Cygwin/X
    on the Wintel box and start the KDE on that X server from a Linux or Unix
    box. Then you use that to manage the other X clients from other hosts on the
    network. There are all kinds of reasons for doing things that way.

    > I think one thing where MS damaged people is by instilling this idea
    > that a good server should have a GUI.

    It should have GUI tools. I really whish people would have realized the value
    of KSnuffle, and maintained it. I have yet to see a viable replacement.
    That Gtk thing people have told me works just as well doesn't come close.
    There were some other network monitoring tools around in the early days of
    the KDE which have vanished, and not been replaced by equivalent tools.

    > When I was still a Windows user, I used to think of UNIX as an old,
    > outdated system, with a horrible user-interface. All mono-chrome..
    > That was until I actually saw a real live UNIX machine and worked on
    > it. It opened my eyes.
    > I was lucky, I suppose, that my first interaction with UNIX was from a
    > Sun Sparcstation, running CDE,

    Why do you think I contacted sun and suggested they get behind open source
    desktops?

    > I never really used the Sun box for anything else, than it's X-server,
    > so I could run Nedit (a graphical editor) on the HP box.

    There is only One True Editor.

    > > lists of people carping about "noobs that put a gui on a server" ...
    > > well, damn ... if it makes the transition and traslation to linux
    > > easier why, as a linux advocate, would you (not you personally) want
    > > to be so freaking hostile about it?
    >
    > I don't have a problem with noobs putting a GUI on a server, I have a
    > problem with experienced admins running a GUI on a server. (I did not
    > mean to offend noobs, sorry)

    I don't have a problem with anybody using the tools they feel most comfortable
    with. If it gets the job done, it gets the job done. And GUIs often enable
    me to do things more quickely, and to identify problems more easily.

    > I also have a problem with SLES defaulting to a GUI install.

    What I have a problem with is that it seems difficult to install SuSE Linux
    without a GUI. Too often, installing things which shouldn't have
    dependencies on GUI rpms have such dependencies.

    > I
    > expected it to default to the minimal install, or options like
    > "Webserver", "Mail server", "File Server", etc and then you pick the
    > options you want.
    > But the default Graphical desktop install threw me a bit.

    I agree. There should be a basic server that has no GUI stuff at all.

    > 2) You set up a LTSP server where people will run desktops from dumb
    > terminals.

    Such as Windows XP, yer catchin' on!

    Steven

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
    Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
    Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Steve Graegert: "Re: [SLE] Unable to mount DVDs"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Are there advantages of Linux over XP Pro.?
      ... Mandrake 10.1 Official - Test systems are as follows: ... The Mandrake 10.1 install was also painless, but the GUI would not run. ... and it worked perfectly with our Exchange 2000 server and ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: [SLE] ...and speaking of SuSE / Novell...
      ... I have seen a number of newbies that start out with installing a GUI ... on a server, until I show them that it is not really needed. ... if it makes the transition and traslation to linux ... I also have a problem with SLES defaulting to a GUI install. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Possible bug in Exchange GUI (Exchange System Manager.msc)
      ... Connection settings for SMTP server. ... Script that I used for changing settings and reading them ... And GUI ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
    • Re: Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves
      ... in marketing and they still manage only 30% of the server market. ... I don't as yet know what Ubuntu's niche is - windows malcontents? ... servers due to the desktop support as well as gui management tools. ... Part of the issue in the past has been many admins that new Unix found ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Switching from Command line to GUI
      ... the installation is completed and log on I see that its all command line, ... how can I switch so to GUI? ... Ha, that's what a 'server' install *IS*, a bare-bones installation ... Of course a server can also run a GUI, ...
      (Ubuntu)