Re: [SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML
From: Per Jessen (per_at_computer.org)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] Getting just the blues from YaST updates"
- In reply to: Steven T. Hatton: "[SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML"
- Next in thread: Steven T. Hatton: "Re: [SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML"
- Reply: Steven T. Hatton: "Re: [SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:06:47 +0100 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> My own opinion is that both of these specification are a bad use of
> XML. Nonetheless, they seem to provided what the masses want in a word
> processor.
The masses surely couldn't care less how the document format is defined,
be it in XML or not? I like it being in XML right now - it makes it
easy to do fast mass document merges ("mailmerge") external to OO.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
-- http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed anti-spam and anti-virus solution. -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
- Previous message: Randall R Schulz: "Re: [SLE] Getting just the blues from YaST updates"
- In reply to: Steven T. Hatton: "[SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML"
- Next in thread: Steven T. Hatton: "Re: [SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML"
- Reply: Steven T. Hatton: "Re: [SLE] OpenDocument vs. MS Open XML"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|