Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Kevanf1 <kevanf1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:42:38 +0000
On 30/12/05, Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kai Ponte wrote:
>
> > My guess is - like Apache - many people are still using the
> > depricated version (heck, they're coming out with 6.0 very shortly)
> > and Novell didn't want to upset anyone.
>
> A lot of people don't like being bleeding edge. There are occasionally
> problems in newer releases that will prevent you from upgrading. I for
> instance am still running php 4.3.8 because an ancient problem with
> setlocale():
> (http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=31594)
>
>
> /Per Jessen, Zürich
>
>
Ah, could this then be a problem for those using the download version
of SuSE 10? It does not have Java at all. Yes, it can be downloaded
from the Jem Report pages but there is an inconsistency by shipping a
version of OO.o that will not function properly as it is.
--
==============================================
I am only human, please forgive me if I make a mistake it is not deliberate..
==============================================
Take care this Xmas. PLEASE DON'T drink and drive.
Kevan Farmer
Linux user #373362
Cheslyn Hay
Staffordshire
WS6 7HR
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Ken Schneider
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- References:
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Kai Ponte
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] problems with a newly created raid partition
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] Monitor specs for Apple Studio 21"
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|