Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:06:53 +0100
Kevanf1 wrote:
>> A lot of people don't like being bleeding edge. There are
>> occasionally
>> problems in newer releases that will prevent you from upgrading. I
>> for instance am still running php 4.3.8 because an ancient problem
>> with setlocale():
>> (http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=31594)
>>
>>
>> /Per Jessen, Zürich
>>
>>
> Ah, could this then be a problem for those using the download version
> of SuSE 10? It does not have Java at all. Yes, it can be downloaded
> from the Jem Report pages but there is an inconsistency by shipping a
> version of OO.o that will not function properly as it is.
Perhaps - after all, as someone pointed out to me recently, Java is
optional for OpenOffice.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed anti-spam and anti-virus solution.
Let us analyse your spam- and virus-threat - up to 2 months for free.
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Fred A. Miller
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- References:
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Kai Ponte
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Kevanf1
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Prev by Date: [SLE] re slowly upgrading my system
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] Looking for a book that describes highly available DHCP setups
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
