Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: "Fred A. Miller" <fmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:54:48 -0500
On Friday 30 December 2005 8:06 am, Per Jessen wrote:
> > Ah, could this then be a problem for those using the download version
> > of SuSE 10? It does not have Java at all. Yes, it can be downloaded
> > from the Jem Report pages but there is an inconsistency by shipping a
> > version of OO.o that will not function properly as it is.
>
> Perhaps - after all, as someone pointed out to me recently, Java is
> optional for OpenOffice.
Yes, but if you want to use Base, you MUST use Java.
Fred
--
Paid purchaser of ALL SuSE Linux releases since 6.x
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- References:
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Kai Ponte
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Kevanf1
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|