Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: "Kai Ponte" <kai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:21:51 -0800
> On 12/29/05, Fred A. Miller <fmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 December 2005 11:45 pm, Greg Wallace wrote:
> > > >SUSE SHOULD have shipped JRE 1.5x with SUSE 10.0 and the OO
pre2.0 release
> > > >would have worked properly.
> > > >
> > > >Fred
> > >
> > > Looks like I have some 1.4 and some 1.5 installed. Not getting any
> > > dependency errors either. Can these co-exists without problems?
> >
> > Of that, I'm not certain. I uninstalled 1.4 then installed 1.5.
> >
> In general, JRE 1.4 and newer are designed to co-exist with each
> other.
Before I went to 10.0 I had both the 1.4 and 1.5 JRE and JVM's running
on my laptop with no issues. OOo ran with 1.4, which it needed and I did
all my development, plus ran Azareous in 1.5.
--
kai ponte
www.perfectreign.com
linux - genuine windows replacement part
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- From: Greg Wallace
- RE: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Prev by Date: [SLE] Re: Firefox 1.5: where is the "save page" option?
- Next by Date: [SLE] ipw2200 wireless problem, minor but annoying
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Next by thread: RE: [SLE] OpenOffice 2.0 AND 2.1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
