Re: [SLE] Conky & "buffer overflow detected"

Steve,

On Wednesday 15 February 2006 07:55, Steve Graegert wrote:
On 2/15/06, Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...

OK. So I built the 1.4.0 release here and neither the compile-time
nor the run-time diagnostic results.

So, it's working now? (Your last mail suggests it does :-)

It appears it is. I've got to play with the configurations to find a
display I like and I need to see if Conky actually produces less system
load than GKrellm, 'cause if it doesn't, I'll just stick to GKrellm.


Steve Graegert <graegerts@xxxxxxxxx>


Randall Schulz

--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx