Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: "Bryan S. Tyson" <bryantyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:55:32 -0400
On Monday 15 May 2006 07:31 pm, Greg Freemyer wrote:
XFS does NOT do well with unexpected shutdowns. In particular it can
fill files that are open at shutdown with nulls. I personally would
not use XFS unless I had dual power-supplies connected to dual UPSs.
And yes, I do use XFS much of the time, but I have the above redundant
power and I only use it for real data filesystems, not /, /usr, /var,
etc.
If XFS needs dual power supplies and dual UPSs, what huge advantage does it
have that makes it worth putting up with this?
Bryan
***************************************
Powered by Mepis Linux 3.4-3
KDE 3.5.2 KMail 1.8.3
This is a Microsoft-free computer
Bryan S. Tyson
bryantyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
***************************************
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Carlos E. R.
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Bryan J. Smith
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Greg Freemyer
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- References:
- [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Ralph Ellis
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Greg Freemyer
- [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] 10.1: zmd... anyone else have problems with it?
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] Avoiding Microsoft Exchange Server
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- Index(es):