Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: "Greg Freemyer" <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:37:09 -0400
On 5/15/06, Bryan S. Tyson <bryantyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday 15 May 2006 07:31 pm, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> XFS does NOT do well with unexpected shutdowns. In particular it can
> fill files that are open at shutdown with nulls. I personally would
> not use XFS unless I had dual power-supplies connected to dual UPSs.
> And yes, I do use XFS much of the time, but I have the above redundant
> power and I only use it for real data filesystems, not /, /usr, /var,
> etc.
If XFS needs dual power supplies and dual UPSs, what huge advantage does it
have that makes it worth putting up with this?
Bryan
I believe it was designed for high-speed video feeds. So if you have
an application that needs lots of high-speed streaming data, XFS is a
great solution.
Also, most data centers setups have dual PS/dual UPS, so it is not big
problem for Enterprise Server users.
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- References:
- [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Ralph Ellis
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Greg Freemyer
- Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- From: Bryan S. Tyson
- [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] Avoiding Microsoft Exchange Server
- Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: [SLE] package catalogue not found in cd installation error]
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] XFS Filesystem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|