Re: [SLE] Postfix UCE, rbl, cidr and ehlo
- From: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:27:10 +0200
Sandy Drobic wrote:
That is exactly what I am wondering about. Wouldn't it be better to be
a bit more selective which IPs to block?
If you are using such aggressive blocks you might better use some
restrictions that will block a lot of spam:
And should you just want to try out some these more aggressive
restrictions, prepend 'warn_if_reject' to have a warning logged, but
still accept the email.
If that is not sufficient to cut down spam to a comfortable level,
then use a policy service and greylisting.
greylisting is probably by far the most efficient if you just want to
get rid of spam.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- References:
- [SLE] Postfix UCE, rbl, cidr and ehlo
- From: David Rankin
- Re: [SLE] Postfix UCE, rbl, cidr and ehlo
- From: Sandy Drobic
- [SLE] Postfix UCE, rbl, cidr and ehlo
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] Re: Firefox crashes
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] Apache 2.2 modules missing shared libs
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] Postfix UCE, rbl, cidr and ehlo
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] Postfix UCE, rbl, cidr and ehlo
- Index(es):