Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- From: John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:19:12 -0800
On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:01, Ted Harding wrote:
As we know, the proportion of spam junk in the list
archives is high. For example, out of almost 400 messages
this month, some 175 are spam (44%).
Not true.
They say SPAM in the subect due to some overly aggressive tagging by the list
hosting machine. But they are not in fact spam. Look at them
and you will see.
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
Attachment:
pgpKnbnDUP8lH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- From: Leendert Meyer
- SPAM: Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- From: Bruce Marshall
- Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- From: Ted Harding
- Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- From: Ken Schneider
- Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- References:
- [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- From: Ted Harding
- [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- Prev by Date: Re: SPAM: Re: SPAM: Re: [SLE] SPAM: sources DVD?
- Next by Date: Re: SPAM: Re: SPAM: Re: [SLE] SPAM: sources DVD?
- Previous by thread: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] SPAM: Junk in the archives (yet anither moan)!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|