Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- From: "M. Fioretti" <mfioretti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:21:39 +0200
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 09:58:42 AM -0500, Rajko M
(rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Some vendors that already have kernel drivers that are kicked out,
refuse to write the same in the user space with excuse that they
have no resources for that.
This is probably a stupid question, but then why didn't they wrote
those drivers in user space the first time? I imagine performance is
one reason. If I'm right, how much of a difference would it be? And
are there other reasons?
Well if they don't, why they expect that somebody else should find
time to rewrite their driver, that will bust their sales
Cost development time and money yes, but how could offering more
drivers _hurt_ their sales?
Ciao,
Marco
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 5 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
Life is what happens whilst you're busy making other plans
(John Lennon)
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- From: Rajko M
- Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- References:
- [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- From: Peter Van Lone
- Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- From: Rajko M
- [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|