Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- From: suse@xxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:48:24 -0400
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 06:51, suse@xxxxxx wrote:
Maybe this is why SuSE doesn't seem to get what we're screaming about?
They're all connected closely to their local repo, so they're not seeing
what we are and are assuming that the slowness you're talking about.
Yes, developers should always be on dial up and have nothing faster than
an 800mhz processor and a 1024x768 display.
Then systems would perform.
Not *always*, but if you're developing a software management system that
is designed to be used worldwide on slow connections, shouldn't you, you
know, actually try it out on a slow connection to see if it works OK?
I know you're trying to make a point about bloat and waste, but
honestly, I like my machine to look nice. Everything would be faster if
it was written in assembly, but it would take forever to get anything
actually programmed and you can forget portability.
--
Check the headers for your unsubscription address
For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@xxxxxxxx
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com
Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@xxxxxxxx
- References:
- [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- From: stephan beal
- Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- From: suse
- Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- From: John Andersen
- [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- Prev by Date: Re: [SLE] eric raymond, and binary drivers
- Next by Date: Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- Previous by thread: Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- Next by thread: Re: [SLE] a long-time Suser compares kubuntu and Suse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
