Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- From: John Andersen <jsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:00:09 -0900
On Sunday 12 November 2006 17:50, Kai Ponte wrote:
In any case, I have always strongly felt that software can be copyrighted."Strongly felt" is a strange way of putting it. ;-)
I'm not sure this is an area of feelings, its, rather, a matter of law.
Software source code can and always has been copyright-able.
cat /usr/src/linux/kerne/cpu.c/* CPU control.
* (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Rusty Russell
*
* This code is licenced under the GPL.
That little (C) is the copyright symbol (or what passes for one in the
absence of availability of the real one: ©
Every module of the Linux Kernel has a copyright asserted.
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
Attachment:
pgpDMAuwXyDcy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- From: Fred A. Miller
- Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- From: Randall R Schulz
- Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- From: Kai Ponte
- [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- Prev by Date: [opensuse] Samba says Novell-Microsoft deal sucks
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] 10.2 beta 2 install
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Novell-Microsoft: What They Aren't Telling You
- Index(es):