Re: [opensuse] SCO is toast... Novell go get em



M Harris wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 13:47, Anders Johansson wrote:
Novell's head of kernel development is Greg
Kroah-Hartman.
Now we're getting someplace...

... this is what I am really getting at... and I genuinely am seeking
knowledge; what does it mean to be head of kernel development at Novell? ...
or anywhere else for that matter? (see Greg Freemyer's explanation)

Is the kernel that ships with Suse the "official" kernel that I can download
from the official site unmodified <?> or, is it modified by kernel
development at Novell?
note: I am not asking whether the kernel has non gpl
code at this point... only whether Novell kernel development modifies the
official kernel before redistribution and redistributes it under the gpl
license, or--- whether Novell modifies the kernel via the process Freemyer
described?


It is a SuSE modified kernel for SuSE's dist only. The additions SuSE put into
it are only 'blessed' by SuSE not by the 'official' kernel community.

And I have another question along the same lines... consider:

"Linux 2.6.15 consists of 18,811 files and 7,290,070 lines of code."

Folks, that's a lot of lines of code... what I want to know is how many of
them were coded (patched) by Novell kernel development? What do those patches
do? How many of those patches, or future patches, will M$ control behind the
scenes... and if Freemyer's explanation is correct... how can we be sure that
the "patches" that get through are *ok*. And I don't mean gpl vs non gpl...
and I don't mean legal vs illegal... this is a control issue for me... I
mean, controlled by M$ to provide degradation of performance, or a back-door,
or anything else... that gets slipped by the watch-dogs on the Linus
team----- *


SuSE, but only SuSE, controls every line of code in every kernel they ship. But
kernels they ship are NOT the 'official linux kernel'. The only way to get that
is from kernel.org. And every thing there goes through the 'official kernel
community' before it is released. I can only assume that the 'official kernel
community' would catch anything 'wrong' that a possible Novell employed
contributor might contribute or attempt to contribute. However if I'm not
mistaken SuSE does employ some considered 'in the official kernel community'.
Even so, very few lines of code get in the official kernel without many people
seeing them first.

Mark
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stop the Linux kernel madness
    ... >> This is absolutely not our problem and we don't know who to contact at SuSE to fix ... > Are you referring to userspace applications which fail under Suse's kernel, ... > could be a bug in the Suse changes, ... > suse are sitting on 1500 patches is a combination of: ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: I Abandon Suse for UBUNTU - James Pannozzi Will use and develop for UBUNTU!
    ... Then why did you bother ask for a fork of SUSE if you don't need one? ... Novell's cute legal game runs up against a brick wall called GPLv3. ... least a temporary freeze on accepting any code from these Novell employed ... Kernel 2.6.18 predates this deal, ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: [SLE] SUSE patched kernel
    ... > vanilla kernel using the SUSE .config results in a kernel panic. ... > find out which patch is responsible for the machine booting. ... the labour of stripping out suse patches, ...
    (SuSE)
  • [opensuse] Xen +Suse 10/2 +Latitude D820 Howto
    ... Here is how I installed WinXPsp2 (Dell OEM) in Xen Kernel under Suse ... 32-bit and 64-bit installations. ...
    (SuSE)
  • RE: [SLE] can suse 9.3 be forced to use kernel from 9.0, 2.4.21-99-default?
    ... the original kernel from suse 9.0. ... However lots of things improve with new versions of suse, ... install suse 9.0 on standard vmware machine, ... boot suse 9.3 install cd and upgrade, keeping the old kernel, and adding ...
    (SuSE)