Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- From: Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:06:30 +0800
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 05:56 +0000, riccardo35@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu 29 Mar 2007 02:14, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Ah, would appreciate any effort on solving my problem.
uuencode/uudecode
Probably I didn't made my point clear but my request seems to have
nothing to do with uuencode:
As far as I understand uuencode make sure the files are byte-to-byte
correct even transferred from/to/between hosts with different charsets.
What we want is the file names are ideograph-to-ideograph correct, which
means byte-to-byte correct is just what we want not happen, well
actually byte number should not be equal, originally 3 bytes (per
ideograph) on SuSE, when unpackaged in Windows we want it 2 bytes (per
ideograph) only. Because in UTF-8 ideographs are usually 3 bytes each,
in GB18030 should be 2 bytes.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- From: Simon Roberts
- Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- From: Carlos E. R.
- Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- From: Zhang Weiwu
- Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- From: riccardo35
- Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] Program to autoexecute html page on dvd/cd
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] Problem with NFS mounts
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] should I prefer RAR format for deliverying file to Windows users
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|