Re: [opensuse] Raid 5 installation



Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


The Friday 2007-06-22 at 07:46 -0400, Richard Creighton wrote:

The ultimate goal should be to have the best raid 5 possible with the
hardware you have ;-p

<snip>

...I did. In fact, in order to get the 5th drive to run my tests, I
had to cannibalize an older RedHat system that is 'wounded' because I
lost a cpu fan and damaged the cpu chip. I was going to replace the MB
in that system at some point but now, I may also be short a drive having
had to use it in what I thought was ample hardware; A new ASUS system
MB with 4 SATA drives and with a so-called hardware raid controller
built-in to the MB. As it turns out, that controller is a 'fake-raid'
which borrows cpu cycles but still, with the hardware I had, under
Windoze, the configuration would have worked (demonstrated), but I
refuse to contaminate my system with that OS and I believe anything
Windoze can do, Linux can (or should) be able to do better.


Thus, use software raid in linux, which also works out of the box. No need to use the fake-raid drivers, and has probably the same speed, and decidly
better support and compatibility.

I don't see any advantage in using the fake raid method, except using windows - and you aren't, so why go the difficult road?

With software raid you do not need an extra drive, just a plain /boot partition replicated on all disks. I'm almost sure it is documented somewhere.


I'm planning on experimenting with that. I recently bought an IBM Netfinity X232 server, with 4 18G SCSI disks. I've currently got SUSE 10.2 running on it, but without RAID.


--
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [opensuse] Raid 5 installation
    ... I also purchased 4 WD 400G SATA drives to make a 1.09T ... raid5 array under Linux, SUSE 10.2. ... (which would defeat the hardware raid controller builtin to the MB). ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: linux raid vs hw raid
    ... old fileserver hardware I have on hand. ... But, as you probably know, these drives are reasonably ... desktop-class drives as JBODs and using mdadm to RAID them. ... want to move to bigger disks. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Disk management
    ... you don't need to do a thing with the raid configuration. ... Hardware mirroring is done at the drive controller's hardware level. ... If your drive controller is not natively supported you'll want to boot the ... | controller) then wipe both drives then load the win2003 and add the mirror | back in? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment)
  • Re: Clone those discs, people
    ... hardware failure and that's becoming quit rare anymore. ... RAID bit in. ... Bob's technique) handles hardware failure, cockpit failures, malware ... and all other types of failures pertaining to hard drives. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: RAID LICENSE - any one using and having fun with it?
    ... CPU utiliziation - does the software increase the amount of CPU usage? ... We've got two different RAID setups. ... We cut our teeth on the Mylex platform and started with RAID-5 but I don't ... RAID-10 uses more drives than RAID-5 but if your time and/or data are ...
    (comp.os.vms)