Re: [opensuse] Virtual domain, between Postfix and Qmail



El vie, 29-06-2007 a las 15:06 +0200, Sandy Drobic escribió:
Hudibras wrote:

What problem are you trying to solve? If the question is "can Postfix do
that?" the answer is "yes, it can, and a lot more, too".
If the question is "Which MTA should I use?" The answer is "Use the one
you are able to administer and debug.".

I do prefer, no doubt about it, qmail.
Check www.shupp.org, and install in a twinkle the best mail server
(imho, of course).
And after, enjoy with a master piece of software.

What features were the deciding factor for you to choose Qmail? I don't
have any experience with Qmail myself, I chose Postfix because it has a
great support community, a very active development and the documentation
is extensive and accurate. Features like DSN and Policy Server/Milters
also became very important.

Do as you like. It's only my advice.

But after many years testing nearly every mail server, I don't change
qmail for anything in this world. It's simply a master piece of
software. People who knows me also know my opinion about qmail, and I
think this way from 1998-1999, when I tested the first time.

All features you like in a mail server, qmail does have them. So, why
don't you try and if not of your taste, install any other.
I can assure you my qmail is really the same I've got from 2002. And I
sleep peacefully while qmail works. That's not good, I know, but if you
don't want be ever watching a mail server, install qmail and forget
yourself.


If I had to choose another MTA other than Postfix I would probably switch
to Exim.

Postfix and Exim are two great mail servers, but I still do prefer
qmail, because (and it's only my opinion) is much better in most cases.
qmail version is the same from 1998, and it does not need any more; but
there are many people around helping and making "add-ons", making it
more powerful and never, never, never has a security hole or anything
like these.
However, sendmail or postfix really have holes... or is that not true?

So decide and have a try qmail, and you'll not be disappointed.

Cheers,
Alejandro.

--
Sandy

List replies only please!
Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [opensuse] Virtual domain, between Postfix and Qmail
    ... If the question is "Which MTA should I use?" ... What features were the deciding factor for you to choose Qmail? ... to compare it to Postfix. ... in Sendmail. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: [opensuse] Virtual domain, between Postfix and Qmail
    ... If the question is "Which MTA should I use?" ... What features were the deciding factor for you to choose Qmail? ... to compare it to Postfix. ... qmail than Sendmail or Postfix. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] FWTK and smap/smapd
    ... Postfix or qmail. ... > smap/smapd don't have a perfect security track record. ... You may run any simple mta that does mimick sendmail good enough. ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: [OT] Which one is best MTA for me?
    ... work/patching/hacking, go with postfix. ... security, go with qmail. ... I use qmail with vpopmail not because it's necessarily the best MTA but because I know it backwards. ... I've been meaning to get a postfix/mysql mail server up for a few months now but just haven't had the time. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: [opensuse] Virtual domain, between Postfix and Qmail
    ... What features were the deciding factor for you to choose Qmail? ... But after many years testing nearly every mail server, ... to compare it to Postfix. ... MTA of their Firewall. ...
    (SuSE)

Quantcast