Re: [opensuse] Banning personal attacks

Basil Chupin wrote:
Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Basil Chupin wrote:
Philippe Landau wrote:
Banning someone out of personal spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
Philip Dowie wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2008 19:11, Banning someone out of personal
spite is uncalled for fascism wrote:
A) Personal spite can in no way be equated with Fascism.
B) Banning someone for irrelevant, uncalled-for, slanderous and hateful
rhetoric is entirely appropriate.
Isn't the phrase we are looking for here "please, don't feed the trolls"?
If Henne's going to be a disrespectful jerk, then
I'm going to call attention to it, until he stops.
One rule of successful policing, Aaron,
is not to make everyone your enemy.

I'm not making YOU my enemy.

I'm just calling attention to Henne's repeated illogical
scapegoating of me, because I look at computer problems
from a different viewpoint than his.

If you don't like it, then stand up and do the right thing,
and take Henne to task.

But I am *NOT* going to let him bully me by abusing
his administrative powers.

So why aren't you posting under your true name but rather pretending to be someone else?

Because I decided to stop glossing over the problem,
and instead, call attention to it.


It would seem that in your eyes Henne is obviously a 'watermelon' in disguise and therefore deserves to get "da full treatment". Do you perhaps consider that he ought to have an extended holiday in Abu Ghraib?

Lame.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Relevant Pages