Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- From: "Larry Stotler" <larrystotler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:15:27 -0400
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxx> wrote:
Last night around 22:20 local I started a F9 HTTP install from
mirrors.kernel.org onto a 2GHz P4 machine with 1G RAM & 1G swap space over a
broadband connection that normally gets me a full CD iso in 20-30 minutes,
and a Factory install start to finish in about an hour. A little over 11
hours later Anaconda announced preparation to install (downloading selected
packages apparently) had finished. Now, an hour later, it's proceeded to
install only 225 of the total of 859 selected packages.
I think that's a little unfair to Fedora because I think that the
mirors are overloaded. I had a hard time with the net install and
gave up and pulled the live cd and installed from there. Then I just
pulled the repository from mirrors.kernel.org. Install times are a
lot better from local NFS.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- From: Roger Oberholtzer
- Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- References:
- [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- From: Roger Oberholtzer
- Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- From: Pavol Rusnak
- Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- From: Roger Oberholtzer
- Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- From: Felix Miata
- [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] Kdetv And Sound Blaster Audigy SE don't match
- Next by Date: [opensuse] resolution in runlevel 3, weird startup, flash in firefox, ...
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] OpenSUSE 11 vs Fedora 9
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|