Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- From: Roger Oberholtzer <roger@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:27:05 +0100
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 15:56 +0100, Jan Karjalainen wrote:
I have a very simple and extremely strong reason to consider the
presence of the in-treply-to header a necessity:
this is a maling list, thus all replies to messages originating from
it are supposed to belong to the list, at least by default.
The other behaviour is surely a possibility, but without any doubt it
should be considered the exception and not the norm.
So, since all traffic is supposed to converge to the list (by default)
all clients should be put in the position to behave accordingly
(following the protocol).
In my humble opinion the
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
"document" is 200% bullshit
Full agreement here. This is the only list I am on that does what it
does. If a user cannot be identified by (1) a proper header or (2)
information in the e-mail, why should that person be allowed to post to
the list? Note the inclusion of "in the message" - so stop the e-mailer
inconsistency arguments - ever hear of a signature? If getting a
response to you as an individual is so important, say so in your message
and be sure the info in your signature is correct. I am still confused
about what messages require personal contact that is off-list. Is the
list a dating service now? :)
Is the argument really that tracking people who cannot be bothered to
properly identify themselves is more important than improved list use?
Messages belong to the list. Period. They do not belong to the
individuals. If you ask a question in the list, expect the answer to be
there, not as private correspondence. The list is not a private source
of information for anyone. It is a shared resource. The resource is the
list. If all answers do not go to the list, then he list suffers.
As to the "it has been decided" argument: that is what is always said. I
was not aware the list was managed in a closed, non-adaptive fashion.
Sure we have all gotten used to the SUSE list reply setup. Just like we
get used to sleet and bad lunch food. It does not mean we all like it.
--
Roger Oberholtzer
OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST
Ramböll Sverige AB
Krukmakargatan 21
P.O. Box 17009
SE-104 62 Stockholm, Sweden
Office: Int +46 8-615 60 20
Mobile: Int +46 70-815 1696
--
"On two occasions I have been asked (by members of Parliament!),
'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures,
will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend
the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
- Charles Babbage 1791-1871)
English computer pioneer, philosopher
And remember:
It is RSofT and there is always something under construction.
It is like talking about a large city with all construction finished.
Not impossible, but very unlikely.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- From: Carlos E. R.
- Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- From: cagsm
- Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- References:
- There will be no reply-to-muning on this list (was Re: [opensuse] Re: Reply to mailing lists)
- From: Henne Vogelsang
- [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- From: Felix Miata
- Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- From: Nico Sabbi
- Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- From: Jan Karjalainen
- There will be no reply-to-muning on this list (was Re: [opensuse] Re: Reply to mailing lists)
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] Reply to mailing lists
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] Re: There will be no reply-to-muning on this list
- Index(es):