Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:05:38 -0800
On Tuesday March 1 2011, David C. Rankin wrote:
Curious about a strange package name with an interesting definition
prompted a bit of investigation:
...
"Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
I'm all for having a rich and diverse vocabulary, but reaching so
far back into the Greek vernacular... I just have to ask, "What were
they thinking...?"
You're disparaging the notion of ontology???
<http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/>
...
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Randall Schulz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] [11.4 RC2 64bit]-Missing Icons For Some Installed Programs?
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
