Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- From: Sven Burmeister <sven.burmeister@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:41:04 +0100
Am Mittwoch, 2. März 2011, 20:34:00 schrieb Stan Goodman:
http://learn.to/quote
When annoyed by a substantive argument, the best policy is to find a
punctuation mistake.
Or there might be some people that can distinguish between the content of a
thread and its style. Both of you failed style-wise. I did not state anything
about the content – reading something into it just shows how hard you try.
Please learn to quote, no matter of what topic a thread is.
Sven
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- From: David C. Rankin
- Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- From: Sven Burmeister
- Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- From: Stan Goodman
- [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"
- Index(es):