Re: [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?
- From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 15:17:40 +0200
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 07:58:41AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* David C. Rankin <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [05-07-11 23:33]:
I restarted 11.4 and had a flurry of sustained hard drive activity
and I took a look at what was running in top. I was quite surprised
when I found:
4955 david 39 19 319m 18m 10m R 47 0.5 0:11.26 tracker-extract
4666 david 20 0 192m 19m 5788 S 38 0.5 0:19.49 tracker-store
4550 david 39 19 279m 22m 6604 S 8 0.6 0:06.54 tracker-miner-f
.....
So what is this thing? Is it worth keeping? Should I just nuke it?
What is the collective wisdom on whether it works or is it just
another waste of cpu cycles and index db space?
I don't have tracker & co. on my virgin 11.4 install and it is not
installed by *default*, so it must have been something that *you* deemed
necessary and desirable when you choose what you wanted included in your
installation :^).
Do you not keep indexes of anything, anywhere? How do you find something
that is seldom used and doesn't have a "perfectly logical location"?
It is in the GNOME pattern at least. Also pulled by some GNOME software if you
are using KDE.
Ciao, Marcus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?
- From: David C. Rankin
- Re: [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?
- From: Patrick Shanahan
- [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] Re: net install via (transparent) proxy
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?
- Next by thread: Here we go again. (was Re: [opensuse] 11.4 - is 'tracker' 'beagle' in disguise?)
- Index(es):