Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: jdd <jdd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:50:45 +0100
Le 08/12/2011 12:33, Linux Tyro a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Felix Miata<mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Grub Legacy does everything I'm aware that I need done from a bootloader
quite well thank you very much.
Well, so Suse would remain with it always?
grub2 is already available, simply not default.
and time going it's interest may grow and with it people coming
I had a very hard way learning grub 1 and I'm not in a hurry to drop it and learn an other stuff :-(
jdd
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Carlos E. R.
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- References:
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: LinuxIsOne
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: LinuxIsOne
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Carlos E. R.
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Linux Tyro
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Felix Miata
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Linux Tyro
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] Kde network manager plasmoid pain still hurts
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|