Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:36:33 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-12-08 12:50, jdd wrote:
grub2 is already available, simply not default.
Not only that, but not configured by YaST, which makes it close to unusable
for many people.
- --
Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7gvWEACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WJdQCeOGBIwYwqFlGZ3flFehRZS2QI
5NYAn12IdUXxISCjzIts/6FSukYQHac+
=bV6v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: LinuxIsOne
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: LinuxIsOne
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Carlos E. R.
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Linux Tyro
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Felix Miata
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Linux Tyro
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: jdd
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by Date: Re: Clinging to Microsoft (was Re: [opensuse] Why openSUSE is less popular than Ubuntu?)
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|