Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Anton Aylward <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:32:50 -0500
Dennis Gallien said the following on 12/08/2011 07:23 PM:
On Thursday, December 08, 2011 10:07 AM Anton Aylward wrote:
Indeed: go learn about the various machine architectures Linux has to
boot onto, go learn about disk layout ...
Anton, don't leave out reading the bios hardware map and making bios calls :)
Thank you.
Of course since I'm not a bootloader programmer I'm sure I've missed
many other things as well.
--
Why do cats get fur balls and dogs don't?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Linux Tyro
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- References:
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: LinuxIsOne
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Sven Burmeister
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Anton Aylward
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Dennis Gallien
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] 11.2 to 12.1
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] Re: [opensuse-factory] equivalent to boot.local for systemd
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Index(es):