Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Linux Tyro <opensuse.bkn1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 01:18:08 -0500
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Anton Aylward <opensuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course since I'm not a bootloader programmer I'm sure I've missed
many other things as well.
I guess the most of the things you have missed might be belonging to Hardware.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Anton Aylward
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- References:
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: LinuxIsOne
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Sven Burmeister
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Anton Aylward
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Dennis Gallien
- Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- From: Anton Aylward
- [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Prev by Date: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by Date: Re: [opensuse] A request to Attachmate/Novell
- Previous by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Next by thread: Re: [opensuse] why not openSUSE used grub 2?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|