Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- From: Anthony David <adavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:11:38 +1100
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 05:54:57PM +1100, Sasha Tsykin wrote:
> Anthony David wrote:
> > I haven't used either of these tools, but they may be reporting different
> > memory figures (working set size vs total virtual memory used). Try using
> > the top command in a shell. That clearly by default breaks up the memory used
> > and should show you what mozilla-thinderbird-bin is using.
> They do report different things, I wasn't reading it properly, thanks.
> > Performance of many email clients is inversely proportional to the size of
> > the inbox. Is your's large?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> This still doesn't tell me what percentage of the cpu it is using
> (clearly not 0)
Most of the time a lot of programs go to sleep waitng for something to happen.
0% CPU for a process is common. It could be waiting for a signal that never
happens. In fact, strace the process and you could find it sleeping.
--
Anthony David
Gambling(n): A discretionary tax on those asleep during high school maths
http://adavid.com.au/
0xA72CE1ED fingerprint = EA1E C69E FE59 BBE1 AA4B F354 BD09 9765 A72C E1ED
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- From: Sasha Tsykin
- Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- References:
- [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- From: Sasha Tsykin
- Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- From: Anthony David
- Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- From: Sasha Tsykin
- [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- Prev by Date: Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- Next by Date: Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- Previous by thread: Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- Next by thread: Re: [dapper] Memory and CPU usage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|