Re: Gnugpg
- From: C Hamel <yogich@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:44:10 +0000
On Tuesday 2006 January 31 18:40, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> C Hamel wrote:
> >How is it that GPGME was compiled w/o backend support?? Is no ubuntu user
> >interested in encryption/signing? I think that is highly unlikely so
> > would appreciate, once more, someone's solution.
> >
> >Thanks!
>
> Is your Ubuntu installation completely up-to-date? I had the same
> problem before I updated.
>
> aptitude update
> aptitude dist-upgrade
>
> --
> Brant Fitzsimmons
> brant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was afraid you were going to ask that...! The answer is an unqualified
'No!' The emphasis comes from the fact that, aside from Mandrake 9, every
last distro I upgraded --read, SuSE 8.2, 9 Pro, 9.1, 9.2, Gentoo-- all were
virtually unusable post-updating. Lots of stuff broke and I finally gave up
trying to fix what was not broken before I started doing the updates. ...And
that update process took place before I did any customizing. Consequently,
I'm loathe to break an otherwise-working distro.
--
...CH
Attachment:pgpJo5XNbt3lD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Gnugpg
- From: C Hamel
- Re: Gnugpg
- From: Brant Fitzsimmons
- Gnugpg
- Prev by Date: RE: OT: Cleaning a FILTHY Computer
- Previous by thread: Re: Gnugpg
- Next by thread: wifi problem.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
