Re: Gnugpg

Brant Fitzsimmons <brant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:48:47 -0500

C Hamel wrote:

>On Tuesday 2006 January 31 18:40, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
>  
>
>>C Hamel wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>How is it that GPGME was compiled w/o backend support??  Is no ubuntu user
>>>interested in encryption/signing?  I think that is highly unlikely so
>>>would appreciate, once more, someone's solution.
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>      
>>>
>>Is your Ubuntu installation completely up-to-date?  I had the same
>>problem before I updated.
>>
>>aptitude update
>>aptitude dist-upgrade
>>
>>--
>>Brant Fitzsimmons
>>brant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    
>>
>
>
>I was afraid you were going to ask that...!  The answer is an unqualified 
>'No!'  The emphasis comes from the fact that, aside from Mandrake 9, every 
>last distro I upgraded --read, SuSE 8.2, 9 Pro, 9.1, 9.2, Gentoo-- all were 
>virtually unusable post-updating.  Lots of stuff broke and I finally gave up 
>trying to fix what was not broken before I started doing the updates.  ...And 
>that update process took place before I did any customizing.  Consequently, 
>I'm loathe to break an otherwise-working distro.
>  
>

Unfortunately it will not work without an update.  It was a known
problem when breezy was released that was fixed a week or so later.

-- 
Brant Fitzsimmons
brant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Re: Gnugpg

Relevant Pages