Re: key-test

On Thursday 16 March 2006 20:35, Darryl Clarke wrote:
On 16/03/06, C Hamel <yogich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In past msgs my signing keys (two of them) come back bad on this list &
good when I send to myself. These keys have been around the block,
imported to a couple previous Dapper builds, and worked okay. This is
only a key-test. Sorry for any inconvenience... I have re-imported & will
file a bug if they come back as bad.
--

You need to sign the content/message body itself (see many other users
on this list) and not attach a signature.

When any spam, av, maillist daemons add stuff to your messages it will
invalidate the attached signature.


--
~ Darryl ~ smartssa@xxxxxxxxx
~ http://darrylclarke.com

I believe that is what I am doing. At least I know it works on Breezy,
Gentoo, SuSE, et. al., and not on Dapper. The setup in Kmail isn't that
hard, and it is uniform between all. That's my puzzle. If I go back to
Breezy & look at the msgs they'll doubtless be okay. If I'm wrong, I'll post
another saying so, but they were okay, yesterday.
--
...CH

This message was scanned for Spam and Viruses by Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall



--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Slightly different spin on "rules"
    ... You'll never get rid of Spam unless you filter in your mail. ... "David Schrader" wrote in message ... >> message has to be download for the rule to realize the message body ... >>> Okay, here's a slightly different spin on the old rules ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • incorporating new ideas
    ... Okay, at least this post is NOT SPAM. ... think they're going to become gazillionaires by posting ads for crap ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Slightly different spin on "rules"
    ... > Okay, here's a slightly different spin on the old rules ... If one of these email addresses start attracting spam, ... to create a rule for each person saying that if the To/CC ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • Re: try this quiz
    ... I'm okay with the username. ... is in the nature of spam, of course, that there will be many ways (i.e. ... more than one) to get from SPAM and EMAIL to LAMER. ...
    (rec.puzzles)
  • Re: try this quiz
    ... I'm okay with the username. ... is in the nature of spam, of course, that there will be many ways (i.e. ... more than one) to get from SPAM and EMAIL to LAMER. ...
    (rec.puzzles)