Re: I got a good security one more ya.


You should look into encrypting your data you need private as UNIX based
permissions won't work really, well they do but 'root' on the other
machine could easily read it.


--
curtis

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Use SilverKeeper until time machine ships
    ... Knowledgeable unix administrators will know if and how it should be ... The 'root' permissions should only be needed when the core UNIX ... installation needs to be altered, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: Lesson learned / file permissions
    ... You should not have any files owned by root under a normal user's home ... > acually found some that had 777 permissions which I didn't like. ... this on a daily basis to make sure that what I intend to keep private ... work environment. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
    ... You associate a Windows user with a Unix user (eg root). ... Whenever a file is written there by the unix server, it typically comes across as having permissions only of SYSTEM and read. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft
    ... The traditional definition extends beyond UNIX, ... the administrator isn't necessarily the equivalent of root. ... do is determined by a canonical set of permissions, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
    ... >> root is denied all access. ... and the kernel checks the permission. ... The userspace can't enforce the permissions. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)