Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- From: Derek Broughton <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:58:22 -0300
Mario Vukelic wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 11:29 -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:Of course they matter. And when packages are properly built, library
This "Ubuntu is not Debian" mantra is getting old.
For all the parts that really matter, here, Ubuntu _is_ Debian.
Library dependencies and gcc versions don't matter? You can get into
nasty dependency issues. They would be possible to resolve with careful
use of apt-get -f install and dpkg --force-*, but not recommended
without knowledge of the dpkg/apt
dependencies are handled properly.
There's no
reason to assume that you would get broken packages _going to
breezy_.
When I sidegraded from woody to warty or hoary (can't remember), I had
True. And then a great deal of effort went into ensuring that, in future,
Ubuntu packages would always have version numbers greater than the
corresponding Debian ones.
--
derek
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- From: Oliver Grawert
- Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- References:
- Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- From: Busted Monkey
- Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- From: Antony Gelberg
- Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- From: Derek Broughton
- Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- From: Mario Vukelic
- Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- Prev by Date: Re: Modem Driver for Aopen FM56 Modem (Conexant)
- Next by Date: Re: newbie] Breezy =>DapperDrake upgrade fails with error 2?
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- Next by thread: Re: Debian Woody -> Ubuntu Dapper?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|