Re: sudo without password


Michael T. Richter wrote:

UNIX was designed long before there was an Internet. And its security
model shows it. (Sudo is an afterthought, not the primary model.) A
modern security model would be capabilities-based -- you know, two
generations of security architecture past what UNIX was designed with.

Does it matter what it was designed with? Isn't it more important what is has
now?

If the importance is based on primary design, Windows cannot do Internet,
right? As I remember it wasn't really well supported until Win98.

And please correct me if I am wrong, but i believe that OpenSolaris ( a Unix,
that is ) has the capabilities-based security model. That is today, of cause
and not the original design, but that dosen't matter, or what?

--
Morten W. Jørgensen

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Linux has *fewer* vulnerabilities than before.
    ... But saying that it was designed with a good security model from ... The fact that Linus decided to base it on UNIX, ... it came to security and overall design. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Namespace ensembles and interp hide/expose/invokehidden
    ... It is entirely possible that we need to move to a different security model ... for safe interpreters: but if this is the case, ... More 'lack of interested parties' to fix it and propose a ... So its not a design by committee ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)
  • Re: what is the security model of linux?
    ... It is unclear as to what you mean by "the security model of Linux". ... Or perhaps "the security model under which Linux kernel threads are ... Systems - Design and Implementation" or "The Design and Implementation ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Linux has *fewer* vulnerabilities than before.
    ... Saying "server OS" wouldn't be ... But saying that it was designed with a good security model from ... it came to security and overall design. ...
    (Ubuntu)