Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- From: Kipton Moravec <kip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:58:48 -0500
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 23:18 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday 29 June 2006 22:50, Kipton Moravec wrote:
kip@Red:~ $ sudo apt-get -V dist-upgradeIt's telling you which versions you have installed and which versions it is
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade...Done
The following packages have been kept back:
gdk-imlib1 (1.9.14-16.2ubuntu4 => 1.9.14-29ubuntu1)
libkrb5-17-heimdal (0.6.3-11ubuntu1.2 => 0.7.1-1ubuntu3)
libopenal0 (0.2004090900-1.1build1 => 0.2005080600-2.1build2)
moagg (0.18-1build1 => 0.18-3)
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
kip@Red:~ $
It is still too cryptic for me to understand what it is telling me.
thinking it should upgrade to, but can't, e.g version 1.9.14-16.2ubuntu4 of
gdk-imlib1 is currently installed and apt thinks it should be updated to
1.9.14-29ubuntu1.
Looking at these version numbers in the package search tool, to pick one
example:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/dapper/oldlibs/gdk-imlib1
I see that in all cases you have the current breezy version and apt is
thinking you should have the current dapper version.
That indicates to me that it is likely that this goes back to when you
upgraded from breezy to dapper (it appears that you did at some point). I
also notice that all 4 packages are in universe for dapper.
Here are a couple of things to check:
1. Look in /etc/apt/sources.list to see that you have repositories for
universe enabled. Mine look like:
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu dapper-security universe
If there is a '#' in front of the line it is commented out. Remove the '#',
run apt-get update and then try again.
2. Look in the /var/log/dpkg.log for the logs associated with your update to
dapper. Odds are you will find error messages in the logs associated with
these packages. They should point you in the right direction.
Scott K
/etc/apt/sources.list is not there. On mine I found the following file
at
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/sources.list. Is that the problem?
------------------------
deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper main restricted
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'universe'
## repository.
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## universe WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu security
## team.
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper universe main restricted multiverse
deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper-security main restricted universe
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper-security main restricted
# deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 5.10 _Breezy Badger_ - Release i386 (20051012)]/ breezy main restricted
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper-updates main restricted universe
----------------------------
The archive points to a different server, and there are more qualifiers. Do I need to
comment out my lines and change them to what you have? Why would it be different and
in a different place? Did you modify your lines from what came with the package?
Next step look in the /var/log/dpkg.log
2006-06-10 16:44:14 install gdk-imlib11 <none> 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
2006-06-10 16:44:14 status half-installed gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
2006-06-10 16:44:14 status unpacked gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
2006-06-10 16:44:14 status unpacked gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
2006-06-10 17:34:28 status unpacked gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
2006-06-10 17:34:28 status half-configured gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
2006-06-10 17:34:28 status installed gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29ubuntu1
I just noticed it is looking for gdk-imlib1 and gdk-imlib11 was installed.
There are no other lines in the file with just gdk-imlib1.
libkrb5-17-heimdal string is in the file at all.
libopenal0 string is not in the file either.
Searching for moagg
2006-06-10 17:00:46 upgrade moaggedit 0.5-1build1 0.5-2
2006-06-10 17:00:46 status half-configured moaggedit 0.5-1build1
2006-06-10 17:00:46 status unpacked moaggedit 0.5-1build1
2006-06-10 17:00:46 status half-installed moaggedit 0.5-1build1
2006-06-10 17:00:46 status half-installed moaggedit 0.5-1build1
2006-06-10 17:00:46 status unpacked moaggedit 0.5-2
2006-06-10 17:00:46 status unpacked moaggedit 0.5-2
2006-06-10 17:37:19 status unpacked moaggedit 0.5-2
2006-06-10 17:37:19 status unpacked moaggedit 0.5-2
2006-06-10 17:37:19 status half-configured moaggedit 0.5-2
2006-06-10 17:37:19 status installed moaggedit 0.5-2
So I am guessing it found moaggedit not moagg
I searched for the word "error" and there are no cases other than part of a package name.
Kip
--
Kipton Moravec <kip@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- From: Scott Kitterman
- Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- References:
- Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- From: Kipton Moravec
- Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- From: Scott Kitterman
- Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- From: Kipton Moravec
- Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- From: Scott Kitterman
- Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- Prev by Date: Re: ov51x and the eye-toy camera
- Next by Date: Re: Upgrading to Edgy Eft
- Previous by thread: Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- Next by thread: Re: Packages have been kept back -- What to do?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
