Re: GPL compliance
- From: ubuntu@xxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:24:13 -0400
Daniel Carrera wrote:
On Fri, 2006-30-06 at 16:35 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I disagree. If a user got Ubuntu (or any GPL software) on CD and
has no Internet, why should he be forced to buy something (Internet
access) just so that he can make use of his rights? That doesn't make
sense to me.
Indeed... the requirement on 3(a) of "medium customarily used for
software interchange" is a bit vague and fuzzy. My interpretation would
be that if you use the same medium you used for the binaries then that's
fair enough. So, if I'm distributing binaries on-line, then putting the
sources on-line on the same location would be ok. But if I'm giving you
the binaries on a CD, then the sources should be available on CD and I
expect that putting them on-line would *not* satisfy the 3(a)
requirement. But this interpretation is mostly a guess. The license text
on 3(a) really isn't very clear.
I don't see it as all that fuzzy, and if anything, it's looser, not more
restrictive. Besides, this would be under section 3(b), assuming you
got Ubuntu on CD.
The requirement, in simple terms is any one of the following:
a) Provide the source code right along with the binaries.
b) Provide the source code somewhere else.
c) Point to a 3rd party that will provide the source code.
Don't try to parse a legal document as if it was a C program. When it
gets to court, standards of reasonableness apply. Is online
distribution a "medium customarily used for software interchange"?
Well, how many millions of programs are distributed that way, including
virtually every linux distribution ever made? Someone trying to suggest
that the internet is not often used to download programs would be
laughed at.
Remember, the requirements are from the distributors perspective, not
the end user.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Alexander Skwar
- Re: GPL compliance
- References:
- GPL compliance
- From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Gary W. Swearingen
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Gary W. Swearingen
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: ubuntu
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Alexander Skwar
- Re: GPL compliance
- From: Daniel Carrera
- GPL compliance
- Prev by Date: Re: GPL compliance
- Next by Date: Re: GPL compliance
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL compliance
- Next by thread: Re: GPL compliance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|