Re: GPL compliance

On Fri, 2006-30-06 at 11:24 -0400, ubuntu@xxxxxx wrote:
I don't see it as all that fuzzy, and if anything, it's looser, not more
restrictive.

I don't know, IANAL. Far be it for me to say whether it's looser or more
restrictive. I honestly don't know what constitutes a "customary
medium". It might be that you are right and on-line distribution is
enough. And I do agree with you that whether this medium is convenient
or not to the user is probably not relevant. But I wouldn't bet the farm
on what constitutes a customary medium.


The requirement, in simple terms is any one of the following:

a) Provide the source code right along with the binaries.
b) Provide the source code somewhere else.
c) Point to a 3rd party that will provide the source code.

I hesitate to summarize the GPL so much, given that we are trying to
figure out a relatively fine point of the license. If I was trying to
explain the GPL briefly to someone, I might say something similar to
what you said, but your definition loses the details; and it is the
details that we are talking about here.

I disagree with your summaries for (b) and (c) btw. If I wanted to make
them almost as short, I would say:

b) Be willing to give the sources for the cost of the media for 3 years.
c) If you got the binary under (b), then point to the third party that
gave you that offer.


Don't try to parse a legal document as if it was a C program. When it
gets to court, standards of reasonableness apply.

Maybe so, but then it depends on whether a judge considers online
distribution of sources the same as accompanying the binary with the
sources under a customary medium (when what you got was a CD). He might
decide it's the same, but I wouldn't bet on that.

Someone trying to suggest
that the internet is not often used to download programs would be
laughed at.

I'm sure you've seen a few arguments that you thought were technically
laughable go through in court.

Cheers,
Daniel.
--
http://opendocumentfellowship.org
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the
unreasonable man tries to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on unreasonable men."
-- George Bernard Shaw


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • RE: ZyXEL Kernel /BusyBox GPL violation?
    ... >> provide source code by FTP instead of by mail order? ... >> physical medium, if someone orders it. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: GPL question, can open source code can be used to prop. platform?
    ... ]>]>You must provide the source code but it doesn't have to be in the box. ... ]> Their thoughts are irrelevant except as encoded in the GPL. ... ]provide source code by FTP instead of by mail order? ... "on a medium customarily used for software interchange". ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: GPL question, can open source code can be used to prop. platform?
    ... ]>]>You must provide the source code but it doesn't have to be in the box. ... ]> Their thoughts are irrelevant except as encoded in the GPL. ... ]provide source code by FTP instead of by mail order? ... "on a medium customarily used for software interchange". ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Design Metrics - continued....
    ... > design metrics may be confusing the medium with the message: ... > For software the product is the source, which specifies machine behaviour, ... So now we have "source code" in front of us. ... > Software design metrics usually address *descriptions* of the source code ...
    (comp.software.measurement)