Re: hardware raid solutions?

Lea Gris wrote:
Alexander Skwar a écrit :
David Abrahams schrieb:

Does anyone happen to know if hardware RAID is easier to configure
than software RAID?

It certainly is. In true hardware RAID, you configure the RAID in
the "BIOS". The operating system then only sees ONE drive.

In hardware RAID, the controler is a single point of failure. If the controler dies and you can not find the very same controler model/version you are lost in the wild land of unrecoverable incompatible hardware raid setup.


but there are so many ways to fail with all raid solutions. You need to pick the failure you are comfortable with and build a recovery solution around that.

For example, with any raid environment, I use a good backup such as rsnapshot to make sure I have another copy of the data (and a little bit of history)

Software raid (mdX) does work well most of the time. Unfortunately, I have had failures due to crashes, power outages etc. where the raid array doesn't reconstruct. In raid 1, I was left with two discs that were different but neither was obviously bad and I couldn't tell which was the right one hence my move to raid five.

Software raid also has problems when you're doing anything disk intensive like backup every hour or two. Yes, hardware has similar problems but is not my CPU that's being eaten alive. :-)

So, convince me that I can use a software raid solution for my system for all partitions and still be able to boot if the raid array has failed (total failure, one disk, or 2 disk).

if I were to use software raid, I would break up the large disks (200 GB) into 50 GB physical partitions, Raid physical partitions (from different disks duh), LVM the raid physical partitions together and then create logical volumes for all of my system partitions.

the reason for the strategy is that if rate needs to reconstruct, it will take less time to rebuild an individual partition than the entire disks. If all need to be rebuilt, well it's part of a very painful experience. ;-)

also convince me that there's a good notification process that something has failed.

I'm willing to be convinced. Make your best argument for the software raid. And failing that, hardware cards suggestions would also be welcome. :-)




--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT 2nd posting pci ata card ??
    ... I have software raid, are you software raid or does the card ... Which card do you have, does it have PATA connections, my HDDs ... I would always suggest hardware raid over software. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Raid: software or hardware
    ... | Hardware RAID is always preferable over software RAID *if* it is available. ... I have a Tyan S2927A2NRF with 6 SATA ports. ... Presumably I could get a 368MB/s peak with software RAID minus whatever ...
    (comp.os.linux.hardware)
  • Re: Software RAID or File Copy program?
    ... I have a web server with 3 hard drives as laid out below, and basically I would like to know what is the best way to keep a backup copy of the 2nd drive? ... Hardware RAID is out of the budget, and I had figured that Software RAID would be too much overhead for a busy webserver - but now it looks like RAID would be the best way to ensure a constant backup copy of even live files so, any advice? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: 2003 OS Server Hard drive install limit.
    ... I personally do not like software RAID, ... operating system was by-passed and not allowed to initialize and access the ... Software RAID performs each write sequentially, whereas hardware RAID ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: [opensuse] Software IDE RAID versus hardware IDE RAID
    ... I have used software RAID on many systems, just not on a SUSE Linux machine. ... But it's still CPU cycles that could instead be performed by a RAID card with onboard processing. ... With hardware RAID, you have to upgrade your RAID card, too. ...
    (SuSE)