Re: Has Ubuntu Replaced Windows on Your Box?
- From: Lorin Pino <ljpino@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:03:56 -0500
pastafarian wrote:
Sorry to say Ubuntu & Linux will always be the destined piece-of-***What are you doing that requires the computer to stay on? Why not turn
for not handling acpi suspend/hibernate decently.
Why the heck is it so difficult for you people to implement -something
you want to become mainstream- ?
YOU THINK PEOPLE ALWAYS WANT TO LEAVE THEIR COMPUTERS ON, CONSUMING AT
THE LEAST 150W ??
(snip)
it off?
Too many repos, too much crap in those repos, too many steps to do oneI have found that even for this newbie, once the repos are activated,
goddamn thing.
synaptic does not take many steps to install something. Two steps is
too many?
WE DONT NEED TO PROGRAM A COMPUTER FOR EVERYDAY USE, WE NEED IT TO DOOnce again, what are you doing? From watching the list there are plenty
WORK FOR US.
(snip)
of people using (*)buntu on their computer to _work_. They don't seem
to be having any earth shattering problems. Your rant doesn't have much
substance, and only mentions one real problem.
If hibernate is the only thing that draws you back to Windows, is it
worth it for what you are doing?
~Lorin
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Re: Has Ubuntu Replaced Windows on Your Box?
- From: pastafarian
- Re: Has Ubuntu Replaced Windows on Your Box?
- Prev by Date: Re: Three Linux Operating Systems in One Computer (Is it possible?)
- Next by Date: configure, make, make install in 64 bit 6.06 desktop
- Previous by thread: Re: Has Ubuntu Replaced Windows on Your Box?
- Next by thread: Re: Has Ubuntu Replaced Windows on Your Box?
- Index(es):