Re: FAT32 partision > 32GB
- From: Roby <electricalsciences@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:19:23 -0500
Ben Edwards wrote:
Also what are the drawbacks of fat32 apart from performance. Am IMy usb HD came with FAT32 format and I used it that way for almost
correct there are issues with long filenames (seem to remember
something about this).
Ben
three years. No probs with filenames, but I did suffer from bruises
on my forehead. These from banging my head against the wall every
time win2k's defrag program crashed while stirring around treasured
backups. I switched to ext3. Bruises healed. For rare encounters
with windows, I back up with Acronis TrueImage, which speaks ext3.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- FAT32 partision > 32GB
- From: Ben Edwards
- Re: FAT32 partision > 32GB
- From: Jens Cedlind
- Re: FAT32 partision > 32GB
- From: Ben Edwards
- FAT32 partision > 32GB
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for "play"
- Next by Date: help with OpenLaszlo installation
- Previous by thread: Re: FAT32 partision > 32GB
- Next by thread: Re: FAT32 partision > 32GB
- Index(es):